Wednesday, January 22, 2014

NRI’s device stirs legal fight with TV giants in US



WASHINGTON: It is the size of a postage stamp, but is being described as an invention that could topple titans. Indeed, the titans have all ganged up together to stamp out the little guy who has challenged them, dragging him all the way to the US Supreme Court, which will hear the case this coming April. Little guy is unfazed.

Having fended them off and won in lower courts, Chaitanya Kanojia is looking forward to the day the US apex court will hear case No. 13-461 involving the Goliaths, ABC, NBC, Fox et al. vs Aereo Inc, his nifty two-year old company that he sees as the David in this battle.

What Bhopal-native Kanojia has done has shaken the American broadcast industry to its nearly century-old roots. Simply put, the stamp-sized antenna from his company Aereo lets you watch regular TV on any e-device without lugging around an antenna or set-top box or any of the wire and cables that comes with the current system. For a few bucks a month, it even lets you record shows for later viewing with cloud-based DVR.

For long suffering victims of broadcast monopolies who are saddled with scores of useless channels and bills running up to $100 a month, what's not to love in this cordcutting, TV-on-the-go exercise, where Aereo's antennas just pick up signals off the air?

Well, for one, there's a small matter of copyright infringement, argued the consortium of 17 broadcasting giants ranging from Disney's ABC to Comcast NBC to 21st Century Fox. They maintained that Aereo was a threat both to their business model, by undermining the cable retransmission fees, and the size of their audience. While copyright law lets individuals watch anything they pick up by antennas as long as it is for their private use, broadcasters maintained that Aereo's transmissions constitute a "public performance" that requires Aereo to pay for retransmitting them.

But the courts, including a federal appeals court have ruled that Aereo's streams to subscribers were not "public performances," and thus did not constitute copyright infringement . The ruling shook the broadcast industry. For Kanodia's cheerleaders, it is a sign of pique by Big Broadcast, which like Big Pharma, finds the big profits it has long enjoyed as a powerful monopoly challenged by the little guy.

The story goes that two years ago when Kanojia first started his company, he visited the offices of the four big broadcast TV networks to tell them about his plan to upend their business and strike a deal. Their response: We'll see you in court. Now, with victories in the lower courts, the 43-year old Indian disrupter is ready to topple a legacy business which he sees as predatory and having feasted on the system since the 1970s. -TOI

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

My photo
Thrissur, Kerala, India
Those who have power to change things don't bother to;and those who bother don't have the power to do so .................but I think It is a very thin line that divides the two and I am walking on that.Well is pure human nature to think that "I am the best and my ideas unquestionable"...it is human EGO and sometimes it is very important for survival of the fittest and too much of it may attract trouble.Well here you decide where do I stand.I say what I feel.

Followers

Blog Archive