Political appointees
at FTII, their insistence on nationalism first, do disservice to
cinema and television.
Is the Film and
Television Institute of India an incubator for the best of India’s
visually creative talent, or should it impart artisanal training to
prospective propagandists? The clash of diametrically opposed views
about the nature and function of creativity is at the heart of the
epic disaster now playing at the premier film training institute in
Pune, where students have rejected the political appointment of
Gajendra Chauhan. His appointment as president is perceived to owe
less to his prowess in cinema than to his membership of the BJP,
which has given him some prominence in cultural affairs. Other
contenders reportedly shortlisted by the ministry of information and
broadcasting included veteran filmmakers Adoor Gopalakrishnan and
Shyam Benegal, and Gulzar, who is also a lyricist, poet and author.
Chauhan is best known for his small screen role as Yudhishthir, the
eldest Pandava. The FTII president is expected to be a practitioner
of stature who can guide and inspire creativity at the institute.
Besides, four out of
eight “persons of eminence” appointed to the FTII Society also
have pronounced RSS connections. They are as problematic as Chauhan,
for they believe that film students should be equipped with a strong
sense of nationalism along with the necessary creative skills. These
are people apparently so remote from the creative process that they
think it can be press-ganged for political agendas. Their appointment
to the FTII, which the government hopes to make an institution of
national importance, can do enormous disservice to the institution
and to Indian cinema and television, two visibly successful
industries and brand ambassadors for India abroad. The FTII has been
headless since Saeed Akhtar Mirza left in March 2014. Having given
itself more than a year to seek a successor, surely the government
could have done better.
The BJP seems to be
committing the very sin that it has always accused the Congress and
the Left of: stuffing academic and cultural organisations with
political appointees. This revenge tragedy will bring in no
dividends, since every attempt at appropriation devalues
institutions. The appointment of Y.S. Rao as chair of the Indian
Council of Historical Research a year ago, shortly after the NDA
government took office, had reignited fears about the saffronisation
of academia. The appointment of Mukesh Khanna, who has played Bhishma
on TV, to head the Children’s Film Society, once more stoked those
fears. Chauhan’s appointment establishes that they were not
misplaced.
-Indian Express
Political
appointees at FTII, their insistence on nationalism first, do
disservice to cinema and television. - See more at:
http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/flagged-in-pune/#sthash.ZCkDjzV1.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment