The decision to acquire 111 planes by Air India through debt was "a 
recipe for disaster" and should have raised alarm in the government, the
 Comptroller and Auditor General has said.
Terming the move for getting of a "large number" of planes as 
"risky", the CAG said the aircraft acquisition had "contributed 
predominantly" to the airline's massive debt liability of Rs38,423 crore
 as on March 31 last year.
In its latest report tabled in 
Parliament on Thursday, the public audit body also called the merger of 
two erstwhile state-run carriers--Air India and Indian 
Airlines--"ill-timed" and said that "the financial case for the merger 
was not adequately validated prior to the merger".
"The entire 
acquisition (for both Air India and Indian Airlines) was to be funded 
through debt (to be repaid through revenue generation), except for a 
relatively small equity infusion of Rs325 crore for Indian Airlines.
"This
 was a recipe for disaster ab initio and should have raised alarm 
signals in Ministry of Civil Aviation, Public Investment Board and the 
Planning Commission," the report said.
Significantly, the CAG 
recommended, among other measures, "a total hands-off approach (by the 
government) with regard to the management of the airline."
The 
report dealt with several aspects of the ailing national carrier's 
losses, fleet acquisition, merger, huge debt burden, delay in joining 
the global airline grouping Star Alliance and its financial and 
operational performance.
Noting that the fleet acquisition process
 took an "unduly long time", the CAG said the initial proposal was made 
in December 1996 and its examination continued "in fits and starts" till
 January 2004 when a plan was made to buy 28 planes, which was revisited
 and later a decision taken to acquire 68 aircraft.
It said the 
revised plan saw "a dramatic increase" in the number of planes to be 
purchased and maintained that the sequence of events up to November 2004
 clearly demonstrated that the pre-merger AI "hastily reworked" its 
earlier plan.
"This increase in numbers does not withstand audit 
scrutiny, considering the market requirements obtaining then or forecast
 for the future, as also the commercial viability projected to justify 
the acquisition. The acquisition appears to be supply-driven", the 
report said.
Commenting on the "speed" at which the acquisition 
process for 68 aircraft proceeded, it said while the first plan took 
eight years to decide on 28 planes, "between August 2004 and December 
2005, the proposals were formulated by AI, approved by the Board, 
examined and approved by the MoCA, the Planning Commission, the 
Department of Expenditure, Public Investment Board, empowered Group of 
Ministers and also the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs."
Observing
 that many assumptions for the revised plan were "flawed", the CAG said 
the negotiation process was "irregular and adversely affected the 
transparency of the process."
Maintaining that "no benchmarks" 
relating to comparable prices and commercial intelligence were set, it 
said, "Consequently, in the absence of such benchmarks, the 
effectiveness and efficacy of negotiations and the reasonableness of the
 price arrived at is difficult to ascertain."
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment