The decision to acquire 111 planes by Air India through debt was "a
recipe for disaster" and should have raised alarm in the government, the
Comptroller and Auditor General has said.
Terming the move for getting of a "large number" of planes as
"risky", the CAG said the aircraft acquisition had "contributed
predominantly" to the airline's massive debt liability of Rs38,423 crore
as on March 31 last year.
In its latest report tabled in
Parliament on Thursday, the public audit body also called the merger of
two erstwhile state-run carriers--Air India and Indian
Airlines--"ill-timed" and said that "the financial case for the merger
was not adequately validated prior to the merger".
"The entire
acquisition (for both Air India and Indian Airlines) was to be funded
through debt (to be repaid through revenue generation), except for a
relatively small equity infusion of Rs325 crore for Indian Airlines.
"This
was a recipe for disaster ab initio and should have raised alarm
signals in Ministry of Civil Aviation, Public Investment Board and the
Planning Commission," the report said.
Significantly, the CAG
recommended, among other measures, "a total hands-off approach (by the
government) with regard to the management of the airline."
The
report dealt with several aspects of the ailing national carrier's
losses, fleet acquisition, merger, huge debt burden, delay in joining
the global airline grouping Star Alliance and its financial and
operational performance.
Noting that the fleet acquisition process
took an "unduly long time", the CAG said the initial proposal was made
in December 1996 and its examination continued "in fits and starts" till
January 2004 when a plan was made to buy 28 planes, which was revisited
and later a decision taken to acquire 68 aircraft.
It said the
revised plan saw "a dramatic increase" in the number of planes to be
purchased and maintained that the sequence of events up to November 2004
clearly demonstrated that the pre-merger AI "hastily reworked" its
earlier plan.
"This increase in numbers does not withstand audit
scrutiny, considering the market requirements obtaining then or forecast
for the future, as also the commercial viability projected to justify
the acquisition. The acquisition appears to be supply-driven", the
report said.
Commenting on the "speed" at which the acquisition
process for 68 aircraft proceeded, it said while the first plan took
eight years to decide on 28 planes, "between August 2004 and December
2005, the proposals were formulated by AI, approved by the Board,
examined and approved by the MoCA, the Planning Commission, the
Department of Expenditure, Public Investment Board, empowered Group of
Ministers and also the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs."
Observing
that many assumptions for the revised plan were "flawed", the CAG said
the negotiation process was "irregular and adversely affected the
transparency of the process."
Maintaining that "no benchmarks"
relating to comparable prices and commercial intelligence were set, it
said, "Consequently, in the absence of such benchmarks, the
effectiveness and efficacy of negotiations and the reasonableness of the
price arrived at is difficult to ascertain."
No comments:
Post a Comment