The Life Insurance Corporation of India bailed out ONGC’s share
auction on Thursday after it received tepid response from investors.
LIC made a revised bid for 12 crore shares at 3.32 pm, just after the
markets closed — after a broker’s mistake led to the rejection of its
earlier bid.
The auction had earlier received bids for just 29.22
crore shares against 42.77 crore shares on offer through the
institutional placement programme route approved by the Securities and
Exchange Board of India recently.
Experts blame the issue snafu on mispricing and lack of proper planning.
“The
government got a bit greedy due to misguidance on merchant bankers’
part in setting the price. I am pretty sure the placement would have
been a success if they kept the price band at around Rs270,” said S P
Tulsian, an independent analyst.
The government, eager to raise
Rs12,400 crore through the auction, had set the floor at Rs290 a share,
which was at premium to Monday’s closing price of Rs283.55.
At 29.22 crore shares, the auction could garner only Rs8,500 crore based on the Rs290 floor price.
Anand
Tandon, CEO at JRG Securities, believes it was a mistake to adopt the
auction route for a highly liquid stock like ONGC, particularly since
the price was not at a discount.
“Unless the stock is an illiquid
or a fundamentally good one with little floating capital, the auction
route doesn’t make sense,” said Tandon.
“Since ONGC has huge
capitalisation and generates large daily volumes, it doesn’t make sense
to bid unless there is a discount on offer or an institution has a
multi-billion-dollar fund wanting to take a strategic stake. Even then,
the offer for sale was only 5%, with restrictions on the number of
shares one could bid for,” said Tandon.
Some also blamed the poor response on lack of homework onthe government’s part.
“It’s
poor marketing on government’s part. You are not putting anything on
the table for the investors and in a trading phase like this, when
people want to make money in the short term. They should have priced it
more attractively,” said Jigar Shah, head of research, Kimeng
Securities.
What else could explain why ONGC was unable to attract
investors for even 70% of its shares on offer when the public offer of
MCX was subscribed more than 54.13 times?
Experts also believe that frequent change in ONGC’s subsidy burden has worked against it.
“One
is not sure about how much profit they (ONGC) would be allowed to make
as government dictates the same by asking it to share a part of the
subsidy burden,” said Tandon.
Worse, the failure queers the pitch for future issues.
“Right
now, given the setback government has received in case of ONGC, it
would be better for them to remain quiet this fiscal, with only a month
to go. Also, now the institutional investors will get an upper hand in
the coming issues and they would most likely hammer the stock prices 2-3
days before the issue,” said Tulsian.
Also, there is no
motivation for the investment banking fraternity to sell the shares,
said an investment banker, who did not wish to be named. “When you
heavily cut down on commissions, you also cut down the motivation to
sell,” he said, adding that the ONGC misadventure will force a complete
rethink of the auction exercise going forward.
No comments:
Post a Comment